![]() I wanted to avoid this, though, because it seems in my mind to be a worst-case option. The SQL:StmtRecompile event class should be used instead of. Queries can be submitted by using spexecutesql, dynamic SQL, Prepare methods, Execute methods, or similar interfaces. I'm familiar with the RECOMPILE option to flag a procedure to always recompile. The SQL:StmtRecompile event class indicates statement-level recompilations caused by all types of batches: stored procedures, triggers, ad hoc batches, and queries. Not to mention that when we're relying on manual recompiles, a query that runs quickly on our Staging environment might take 20s to run on our Production environment just because of the luck of the draw with the execution plan used in the compiled sproc. We can fix this by recompiling the procedure (after which even the 50,000 row version executes very quickly), but we can't be expected to manually monitor every single one of these queries and recompile the problem ones when they start acting slow. With the way SQL Server optimizes these types of queries, the "small" queries might run in 100ms, while the same exact procedure returning "large" amounts of data might take on the order of 10 seconds. Similar to functions, they can accept parameters and provide output to the user Kindig 63 Corvette Whenever an SQL statement is executed in SQL Server, the relational engine first looks at the procedure cache to check that an existing execution plan for that Check 'Stored procedures' > Next 8 Check 'Stored procedures' > Next 8. However, the issue we've been running into is that the same procedure can be used to pull both "small" amounts of rows (say 10-15) and "large" amounts of rows (say 50,000). So my stored procedures look a lot like: AS IdListTableType ids INNER JOIN Customers c ON ids.Id = c.CustomerId I have a bunch of procedures that accept as an input a User Defined Table Type that is basically just a table with a single column, containing all of the ids I want to pull from a table. We are using SQL Server 2014, by the way, I believe. ![]() ![]() NET application that is based on the concept of fetching "ids" (usually integer values), then passing those ids to the database, where the database will join against those ids and an actual db table to return the full row from the db for each id. SQL SERVER - How to get the list of all triggers using spMSforeachtable In this article, we’re going to discuss the differences between stored procedures and functions have a stored Procedure that do some operation and return 1 or 0 as below Create batch job and add Script and Workflow Stored Procedure zerinde sql sorgular bir kere yazldktan sonra istenildii gibi derlenip. I've been building a data access layer in a. I would appreciate any help with a certain type of query. I've got a question related to what I think comes down to Execution Plans and Parameter Sniffing for stored procedures.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |